Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
192 F.3d 295 · 1999
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 17 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections (2005), Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc. (2005)
31 federal appellate · 17 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Singleton v. Wulff · Wade v. United States · Aaron v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) made a material misrepresentation or a material omission as to which he had a duty to speak, or used a fraudulent device; (2) with scienter; (3) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be applied only in those circumstances where it is clearly fair and efficient to do so.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]ssentially the same elements are required under Section 17(a)(1)-(3) in connection with the offer or sale of a security, though no showing of scienter is required for the SEC to obtain an injunction under subsections (a)(2) or (a)(3)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.