Campbell v. Flemming’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1994
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 425 (§ 225 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · 168 F. Supp. 291 - Aaron v. Fleming · 166 F. Supp. 44 - Dunn v. Folsom · Jacobson v. Folsom · Adams v. Flemming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Substantial gainful activity means the performance of substantial services with reasonable regularity * * complete helplessness is not necessary to a finding of an allowable disability. Sporadic or infrequent activity would not necessarily establish ability to engage in substantial gainful activity.” 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mc Gaha v. Ribicoff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.