In Re Warren’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1990
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co. · United States Nat Bank in Johnstown v. Chase Nat Bank of New York City · Peterson v. Dillon · City Sash & Door Co. v. Bunn · Service v. McMahon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No lien created by this chapter binds the property subject to the lien for a longer period than eight calendar months after the claim has been filed unless an action be commenced in the proper court within that time to enforce such lien ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“nothing in the legislative history of section 108(c) or its predecessor, section 11(f) of the Bankruptcy Act ... indicates that they were intended to apply to other than ordinary statutes of limitation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.