Fassilis v. Esperdy’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1329 (§ 279 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Morgan · Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering · Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. · Ziffrin, Inc. v. United States · Gahagan Construction Corp. v. Armao
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be adjusted by the Attorney General in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. BARRIOS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.