Castaldo v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Hobbies: Preparing’ for the big April 20! You’ll all be sorry that day. Occupation: Senior at CHS and the rest is still unpublished. Personal Quote: when in doubt, pull it out. (computers) -shut up and shoot it— quit whining, it’s just a flesh wound-Kill Em AALLLL!!!!”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Niziol v. Pasco County Dist. School Bd. · Ireland v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department

2. “Claim One 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and property without due process of law or equal protection against individual Sheriff Defendants Stone, Beckham, Gardner, Hicks, Miller, Williams, Guerra, Healy, Lebeda and John or Jane Does 1-50, in their individual capacities — failure to investigate based on creating or substantially enhancing the danger faced by Plaintiff and special relationship Claim Two 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and personal security against Sheriffs Beckham and Stone, in their official capacities, and the Jefferson County Sheriffs Department, based on inadequate policies, practices, and training Claim Three 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and personal security against Howard Cornell, individually based on creating or substantially enhancing the danger faced by Plaintiff and special relationship Claim Four 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and personal security against the Jefferson County School District R-l, for inadequate policies, customs, practices, and training Claim Five 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and personal security against individual Sheriff Defendants Stone, Kiekbusch, Manwaring, Duna-way, Walcher, and John or Jane Does 51-100, in their individual capacities, based on actions and/or failures to act on April 20, 1999 — special relationship Claim Six 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Deprivation of right to life, liberty, and pe”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ireland v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department

3. “[t]he decisions in Davis and Murrell do not address the appropriate inquiry of duty under the Fourteenth Amendment. Davis and Murrell address liability pursuant to Title IX, which proscribes discrimination on the basis of gender. Plaintiffs argue that DeShaney’s application to schools must be reassessed in light of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The notion that the elements of a Title IX claim are transferable to a Due Process Claim imper-missibly presumes that a statute can amend the U.S. Constitution.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 213 F. Supp. 2d 523 - Lindsley Ex Rel. Kolodziejczack v. Girard School District