192 F. Supp. 2d 303 - Ebbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · Boyle v. County of Allegheny · Seitzinger v. Reading Hospital & Medical Center · Cook v. Providence Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s best [sic] can be discerned from the record and the parties' briefs, this conversation [about the statute of limitations] appears to have occurred at some point during 1999.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“notify the person aggrieved and within ninety days after the giving of such notice a civil action may be brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“showed little concern for her case between approximately October 10, 1999 and August 2000.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.