Moore v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 455 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1986 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On April 28, 2014, Dilip Patel "verbally reprimanded, humiliated, degraded, and embarrassed Moore in front of a building inspector and others because Moore did not know what a 'GFI' was." On May 20, 2014, Jose Bosque-Perez "verbally reprimanded him for errors on reports ..., scolded him that he should have known by then how to complete the reports, placed his hand in front of Moore's face to silence him ..., ordered Moore to look at him when he is talking, and escalated the situation to the point where Moore began crying." From June 2014 through September 2014, Dilip Patel, Brian Ruth, and Delton Nichols, respectively, made offensive and insulting remarks or comments suggesting that Moore worked too slow, suffered from a memory loss, had a learning inability, and could not sufficiently comprehend the exercises in the UPCS [Uniform Physical Condition Standards] Inspection Certification Training because of his age.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Carson“all the circumstances, including the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sagar v. Mnuchin“). The Court previously entered summary judgment in HUD's favor on all of Moore's claims but one: his claim that HUD subjected him to a hostile work environment because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Carson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.