Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Ga. 652 - Wall v. Lewis

Wall v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2010

3 state decisions

3019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State · Jackson v. State · Bennett v. Lowry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was the evident purpose of the legislature to make criminal a rate of interest which shocks the moral sense, and to protect the needy from a rate of interest exceeding 5 per cent per month.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.