192 Ga. App. 239 - Hutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Adams v. State (2011), 222 Ga. App. 704 - Elrod v. State (1996)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Smith v. State · National Consultants, Inc. v. Burt · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Lloyd] offered no alibi evidence [below], nor did he at any time request a continuance on the ground of surprise, nor did he otherwise express a need for additional time to rebut any evidence presented by the state. Consequently, it does not appear that the failure to allege the specific date of the offense in the indictment materially affected his ability to present a defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The ineffectiveness of trial counsel is raised for the first time in the context of this appeal, and consequently, the trial court has never had the opportunity to pass on this issue. Pursuant to the mandate of our Supreme Court, this Court is without power or authority to engage in an interpretation of this enumeration of error or otherwise to address its merits. Because `appellate counsel was retained for the first time during the pendency of the appeal,' we are constrained to `remand the case to the trial court for a hearing and appropriate findings concerning the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel.' Smith v. State, 255 Ga. 654, 656 (3) ( 341 SE2d 5 ) (1986). As the Supreme Court has recently held, `(i)n Smith , we established the practice of remanding to the trial court the claim of ineffective assistance, when such claim was raised only on appeal. The advantage of this procedure is that the claim can be promptly resolved by the judge who presided over the trial as opposed to having it resolved by a habeas court somewhere down the road.' Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645 (fn. 1) ( 373 SE2d 1 ) (1988). See also Lloyd v. State, 257 Ga. 108 ( 355 SE2d 423 ) (1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As the Supreme Court has recently held, '(i)n Smith [v. State, 255 Ga. 654 ( 341 SE2d 5 ) (1986)], we established the practice of remanding to the trial court the claim of ineffective assistance, when such claim was raised only on appeal. The advantage of this procedure is that the claim can be promptly resolved by the judge who presided over the trial as opposed to having it resolved by a habeas court somewhere down the road.' Lloyd v. State, 258 Ga. 645 (fn. 1) ( 373 SE2d 10 ) (1988). See also Lloyd v. State, 257 Ga. 108 ( 355 SE2d 423 ) (1987).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.