Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Ga. App. 294 - Causey v. State

192 Ga. App. 294 - Causey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Schneble v. Florida · Johnson v. State · State v. Eubanks · State v. Shepherd Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Factors to be considered by the court in its exercise of discretion are as follows: (1) Will the number of defendants create confusion as to evidence and law relative to the separate defendants?; (2) Is there a danger that evidence admissible against only one defendant (or, where there are more than two defendants, only against certain ones of them) will nevertheless be considered against another?; and (3) Are the defendants’ respective defenses antagonistic to the defenses, or the rights, of another?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.