Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Ga. App. 429 - Dover v. State

192 Ga. App. 429 - Dover v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 243 Ga. App. 584 - Perimeter Realty v. Gapi, Inc. (2000), Medlock v. State (1993)

16 state decisions

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Jones v. State · In re Williamson · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not require that there be proof of an `enterprise,' but only that the accused `through a pattern of racketeering activity or proceeds derived therefrom, ... acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any ..., real property or personal property of any nature, including money.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t is unlawful for any person, through a pattern of racketeering activity or proceeds derived therefrom, to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise, real property, or personal property of any nature, including money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.