192 Ill. 2d 36 - People v. Pullen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
188 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 194 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 203 Ill. 2d 264 - People Ex Rel. Sherman v. Cryns (2003), 242 Ill. 2d 285 - People v. Marshall (2011)
188 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 121 Ill. 2d 537 - People v. Hillenbrand · 89 Ill. 2d 469 - People v. Robinson · 171 Ill. 2d 207 - People v. Thomas · 155 Ill. 2d 188 - People v. Bole · 162 Ill. 2d 282 - People v. Jameson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the surest and most reliable indicator of legislative intent.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the maximum permissible sentence was 120 yearsthe sum of the maximum permissible extended-term sentences for two Class X offenses (730 ILCS 5/5-8-2(a)(2) (West 1994))or 28 yearsthe sum of the maximum permissible extended-term sentences for two Class 2 offenses (730 ILCS 5/5-8-2(a)(4) (West 1994)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[T]he aggregate of consecutive sentences shall not exceed the sum of the maximum terms authorized under [s]ection 5-8-2 [of the Unified Code (730 ILCS 5/5-8-2 (West 1994))] for the [two] most serious felonies involved.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.