Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 Ill. App. 285

Joice v. Norman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 1915

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1915-04-22

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Appeal and error, § 1414*—when findings not disturbed. In an action by a real estate broker for commissions, where the evidence as to the nature of the agreement is conflicting, if the court is unable to say that the finding of the trial court is against the weight of the evidence, its findings will not be disturbed.</p> <p>2. Brokers, § 40*—when entitled to commission though principal refuses to execute contract. A broker, employed by the owner to sell property, is entitled to his commissions when he produces a purchaser, within the time limited hy his authority, who is ready, willing and able to purchase the property upon the terms proposed by the seller, even though the seller refuses to execute a contract on the ground that her husband declined to join with her.</p> <p>3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 27*—when exception to judgment must be shown. Where the bill of exceptions in a first-class case in contract tried in the Municipal Court without a jury fails to show an exception to the judgment, the Appellate Court will not review the evidence nor determine questions of fact.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1937

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1915-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 27*—when exception to judgment must be shown. Where the bill of exceptions in a first-class case in contract tried in the Municipal Court without a jury fails to show an exception to the judgment, the Appellate Court will not review the evidence nor determine questions of fact.
/192/illapp/285 · .json · Public domain