Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 La. 653 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2018

8 state decisions

40193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thornhill · 47 La. Ann. 1225 - State v. Johnson · State v. Conerly · State v. Chandler · Poitevent & Favre Lumber Co. v. Standard Planing Mills & Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a witness who states that he does not remember whether he made certain statements to a person named may yet be impeached by proof that he did make the statements as charged, which he affected not to recall.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.