Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 La. 908 - Elchinger v. Lacroix

Elchinger v. Lacroix’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2017

15 state decisions

40193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paul Hill Saunders v. Daniel Shaw · Succession of Robinson · Stout v. Henderson · Raphiel v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. · Shaw v. Board of Com'rs of Bayou Terre-Aux-Bœufs Drainage Dist.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule does not stand in the way of the granting of a new trial, in the interest of justice, where a judgment has gone by default against the defendant because of a misunderstanding on the part of his or her attorney * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.