Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Md. App. 307 - Bare v. Bare

192 Md. App. 307 - Bare v. Bare’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Petrini v. Petrini · Boswell v. Boswell · Voishan v. Palma · Montgomery County Education Ass'n v. Board of Education · 88 Md. App. 4 - Tannehill v. Tannehill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “includes uninsured , reasonable, and necessary costs for orthodontia, dental treatment, asthma treatment, physical therapy, treatment for any chronic health problem, and professional counseling or psychiatric therapy for diagnosed mental disorders. FL § 12-201(g) (emphasis added). And FL § 12-204(h)(2) instructs that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny extraordinary medical expenses incurred on behalf of a child shall be added to the basic child support obligation and shall be divided between the parents in proportion to their adjusted actual incomes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the court's overbroad award of all medical expenses, without regard to whether they are ordinary or extraordinary, effectively require[d] Mr. Bare to pay twice for ordinary medical expenses[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.