192 Md. App. 405 - Norman v. Borison’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited
2 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. · Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union · Rosenberg v. Helinski · Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Count I (Publishing the state complaint to the Baltimore Sun); 2) Count III (Publishing the state complaint to the Washington Post); 3) Count V (Publishing the federal complaint to the Baltimore Sun); 4) Count VII (Publishing the federal complaint on the internet); 5) Count VIII (Publishing the first amended complaint on the internet); 6) Count IX (Publishing the second amended complaint on the internet); 7) Count X ([Respondent] Borison’s reply to Chaudhry’s Rule 11 Motion); and 8) Count XI ([Respondent] Borison’s opposition to notice of sale claims by the estate).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norman v. Borison““[Standing is a threshold issue; a party may proceed only if [he or she] demonstrates that he has a real and justiciable interest that is capable of being resolved through litigation.” Norman v. Borison, 192 Md.App. 405, 420 , 994 A.2d 1019 (2010), aff'd on other grounds, 418 Md. 630 , 17 A.3d 697 (2011). “In order to have standing, a party must demonstrate an ‘injury-in-fact,’ or ‘an actual legal stake in the matter being adjudicated.’ ” Id. (quoting Hand v. Mfrs. & Traders Trust Co., 405 Md. 375, 399 , 952 A.2d 240 (2008)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he [first amended] complaint contained allegations that ‘anyone at Sussex’ could have discovered the scheme, including ‘the respective principals’ and the ‘owners and employees of Sussex.’ ” After scouring the first amended complaint, we can find no use of the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Norman v. Borison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.