Barthuly v. Barthuly’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1994
2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Riddle v. Whitehill · Baum v. McBride · Burris v. Burris · Hodge v. Kennedy · Gee v. City of Sutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The evidence does not support a finding that Reuben agreed to a salary for Frances.... A partner is not entitled to charge the partnership account for his services unless there is an express agreement that he shall be compensated for such services. Gee v. City of Sutton, 149 Neb. 603 , 31 N.W.2d 747 . It follows, therefore, that the accounting cannot include compensation for Frances’ services as a partner since there was no express agreement between the partners for such compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Daub
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.