Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 N.J. Super. 355 - Rivers v. General Acc. Group

192 N.J. Super. 355 - Rivers v. General Acc. Group’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2004

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

160198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of America · Busik v. Levine · Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp. · 48 N.J. Super. 396 - Mitchell v. Alfred Hofmann, Inc. · 31 N.J. Super. 466 - Collingswood Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. AMER., WORKERS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the damages [were] unliquidated and not capable of ascertainment by mere computation, or where a serious and substantial controversy exist[ed] as to the amount due under a contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “equitable considerations favor a departure from the general rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.