Romanowski v. Brick Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 22, 1983

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1983-11-22

Relies on 185 N.J. Super. 197 - Romanowski v. Brick Tp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2015

17 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

¶1Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 19, 1983.Decided November 22, 1983.

¶2Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUTWEIN.

¶3 *80Russo, Courtney & Foster, for appellant Township of Brick (Joseph L. Foster on the brief).

¶4Shebell & Schibell, for respondent Jeffrey Romanowski (Raymond P. Shebell on the brief).

¶5Novins, Farley, Grossman & York, for respondent Robert Forrester (Kenneth R. Pentony on the brief).

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Havey in his opinion of February 8, 1982. 185 N.J. Super. 197 (Law Div. 1982).

¶8Affirmed.

How this case has been cited

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.