Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 NW2D 762 - State v. Wetzel

State v. Wetzel’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2018

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

11019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Herbert Eugene Blanchard v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden · Byrd v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary · Ford v. State · Tillett v. Warden · State v. Horsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All grounds for relief available to an applicant under this chapter must be raised in his original, supplemental or amended application. Any ground finally adjudicated or not raised, or knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived in the proceeding that resulted in the conviction or sentence, or at any proceeding the applicant has taken to secure relief, may not be the basis for a subsequent application, unless the court finds a ground for relief asserted which, for sufficient reason, was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original, supplemental, or amended application.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'postconviction proceeding is not intended as a vehicle for relitigation, on the same factual basis, of issues previously adjudicated.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.