192 Ohio App. 3d 256 - State v. Sidebeh’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blakemore v. Blakemore · United States v. Hasting · State v. Barnes · State v. Treesh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conversely, if the court determines that the commission of one offense will never result in the commission of the other, or if the offenses are committed separately, or if the defendant has separate animus for each offense, then, according to R.C. 2941.25(B), the offenses will not merge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Pittman“A mistrial should not be ordered merely because of some error or irregularity at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Partin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.