State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “This court has issued conflicting opinions regarding whether an order from which the state has sought leave to appeal under R.C. 2945.67(A) must also be a final order under R.C. 2505.02 for this court to be able to grant leave. In State v. Ford , 9th Dist. No. 23269, 2006-Ohio-6961 [ 2006 WL 3825194 ], Sammy Ford pleaded guilty to felonious assault, domestic violence, and violating a protective order. The trial court sentenced him on the domestic-violence and violating-a-protective-order offenses, but refused to sentence him for felonious assault. The state moved the trial court to reconsider its decision to hold Ford's sentence for felonious assault in abeyance, but the trial court denied its motion. The state timely moved for leave to appeal the denial of its motion for reconsideration, and this court granted the motion. This court wrote that "pursuant to R.C. 2945.67(A) this Court granted the State's motion for leave to appeal. As such, we are not confronted with the analysis of a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02. Rather, we are governed by R.C. 2945.67 which gives this Court the discretion to grant the State leave to appeal any judgment which is not a final verdict." Id. at ¶ 5 ; see also State v. Burroughs , 165 Ohio App.3d 172 , 2005-Ohio-6411 , 845 N.E.2d 540 , at ¶ 11 (court had jurisdiction under R.C. 2945.67(A) to review trial court decision allowing disclosure of grand jury testimony). On the other hand, in State v. Rivera , 9th Dist. Nos. 08CA009426 and ”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jones

2. “[a] trial court order other than one of those four [subject to the State's appeal as of right] may be appealed only if the order is final under Section 2505.02 and the appellate court grants leave.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jones

3. “have such jurisdiction as may be provided by law to review and affirm, modify, or reverse judgments or final orders of the courts of record inferior to the court of appeals within the district.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Jones