Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 P.3d 1 - Stevens County v. Futurewise

Stevens County v. Futurewise’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 108 Wash. 2d 299 - McDaniels v. Carlson · Clain v. International Steel Group · Costantini v. Trans World Airlines · 100 Wash. 2d 660 - Rains v. State · 107 Wash. 2d 196 - In Re the Detention of LaBelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, a prior judgment will bar litigation of a subsequent claim if the prior judgment has a concurrence of identity with [the] subsequent action in (1) subject matter, (2) cause of action, (3) persons and parties, and (4) the quality of the persons for or against whom the claim is made.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “applied cautiously due to the danger of depriving a nonparty of its day in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.