State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2021
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · State v. Jacobs · 101 Wash. 2d 481 - State v. Gore · State v. Tomal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e believe it is better for both the offender and the Department [of Corrections] to have the trial court impose a sentence that is clear to all from the outset.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Linerud“the need to sentence within the statutory maximum is a substantial and compelling reason justifying a departure from the standard range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.