Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 So. 3d 111

In re McCalip

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 20, 2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2016-05-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-05-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1| ¡The Office of. Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory and witnesses. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶2IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Chase McNeil McCalip, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26408, be ■ ¡publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent shall attend the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

¶3IT IS FURTHER ORDERED .that all costs and expenses.in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX,' § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid..

/192/so3d/111 · .json · Public domain