Huffman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · 487 So. 2d 1045 - State v. Whitfield · 905 So. 2d 111 - State v. Anderson · Smith v. State · 522 So. 2d 374 - Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure Re: Sentencing Guidelines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the doctrines of law of the case and collateral estoppel will not apply to preclude consideration of a successive rule 3.800(a) motion when doing so would result in a defendant serving a sentence that exceeds the sentence that could have been legally imposed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.