Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 So. 3d 720

In re Couture

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 22, 2016

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2016-04-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2019

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1| TThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent- neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with his client, and failed to properly terminate the representation of the client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶2IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Keith Michael Couture, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22759, be publicly reprimanded.

¶3IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons.
/192/so3d/720 · .json · Public domain