Harris v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hansberry v. Lee · Fariss v. Lynchburg Foundry · Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Albritton · Cuppy v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. · In Re Constitutionality of House Bill No. 222
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application to revive an action in the name of the representative or successor of a plaintiff, or against the representative or successor of a defendant, shall be made within one (1) year after the death of a deceased party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The real party in interest is one who is entitled to the benefits of the action upon the successful termination thereof.”). . Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 387.010(1) defines minor as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Branham v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.