Arnold v. Lemond’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1993
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matthews v. Crofford · Elder v. Epperson · Barnett v. Dooley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The common law rule is that to effect a forfeiture of the lease for nonpayment of rent, the landlord must make demand before the close of the day that the rent becomes due. In our recent case of Barnett v. Dooley, 186 Tenn. 611 , at pages 615-616, 212 S. W. (2d) 598, 600 , this Court said: “ ‘This State follows the common law rule that, in order to effect a forfeiture of the lease for nonpayment of rent, the landlord must make demand before the close of the day such rent becomes due. Matthews v. Crofford, 129 Tenn. 541, 552 , 167 S. W. 695 . We find in our cases no departure from this rule.’” Arnold v. Lemond, 192 Tenn. 369 , 241 S. W. (2d) 432 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.