Charles Wedding v. Romanza Jerome Meyler’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1996
2 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sherlock v. Alling · Green v. Biddle · The State of Pennsylvania v. The Wheeling and Belmont Brideg Company William Otterson and George Croft · Henderson Bridge Co v. City of Henderson · San Jose Land Water Company v. San Jose Ranch Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Concurrent jurisdiction, properly so called, on rivers, is familiar to our legislation, and means the jurisdiction of two powers over one and the same place.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Savors
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.