Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Va. 794 - Ingram v. Commonwealth

Ingram v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Snyder v. Commonwealth (1961), Johnson v. Commonwealth (1968)

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

1701951196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thacker v. Commonwealth · Dixon v. Commonwealth · Hairston v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Derby · Mullins v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`intent must be determined from the outward manifestation of his actions leading to usual and natural results, under the peculiar facts and circumstances disclosed. This determination presents a factual question which lies peculiarly within the province of the [fact finder].'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “For what purpose would a man attack a defenseless woman, at night, dressed in her night clothes? Inferences and deductions from human conduct may be properly [sic] when they follow naturally from facts proven. In this case, the conduct of the accused, under the conditions and circumstances described, points with reasonable, if not with unerring certainty, to his specific intent to commit rape. It is inconsistent with his innocence, or with any interpretation save that of such an intent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.