State v. Mead’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Parker v. Gladden · State v. Oscarson · State v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once a defendant sets forth sufficient evidence that an irregularity occurred and that it had the requisite capacity to affect the verdict, the State bears the burden of demonstrating that the irregularity did not actually prejudice the jurors against defendant, generally but not exclusively by demonstrating that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Generally, the trial court's discretionary ruling will be upheld where there is some indication ... that the court actually engaged in the balancing test and exercised its discretion under V.R.E. 403.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.