¶1 (concurring in the result) — I do not agree with the theory on which the opinion of the majority is written, but concur in the result upon the ground that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, under the circumstances involved, in vacating the order of forfeiture.
192 Wash. 34
72 P.2d 310
State v. Knizek
Decided October 13, 1937
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1937-10-13
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1946
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1937-10-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →