Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 WIS 519 - Grootemaat v. Bertrand

Grootemaat v. Bertrand’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Julien v. Model Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n · Basse v. Gallegger · Hecht v. Shenners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . it may be said that such provisions are neither penalties nor forfeitures. They are merely conditions of the contract entered into by the parties. They result only in an acceleration of the time of payment. The duties and obligations of the mortgagors remain the same. They must pay that which the mortgage was given to secure. But by reason of the terms of their own contract the time of payment is hastened.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.