192 Wis. 2d 260 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · United States v. Salerno · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Gross v. Hoffman · 174 Wis. 2d 255 - State v. Pittman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[bjecause the issue on appeal is one of statewide concern, we invok[e] our inherent power to vacate the December 22 order and exercis[e] our discretionary authority to deny the State's motion for voluntary dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] person to whom a statute may constitutionally be applied will not be heard to challenge that statute on the ground that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.