Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Wis. 2d 509 - State v. Kruzycki

192 Wis. 2d 509 - State v. Kruzycki’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 93 Wis. 2d 433 - Wirth v. Ehly · 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr · Vollmer v. Luety · Huebner v. State · 88 Wis. 2d 546 - Harrell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When we review a discretionary decision, we consider only whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion, putting to one side whether we would have made the same ruling.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a person who has been convicted of a crime is less likely to be a truthful witness than a person who has not been convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.