Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 Wis. 2d 845 - State v. Garcia

192 Wis. 2d 845 - State v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably 219 Wis. 2d 615 - State Ex Rel. Warren v. Schwarz (1998), State v. Bollig (2000)

2 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

3801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · United States v. Nobles · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a guilty plea in which the defendant pleads guilty while either maintaining his [or her] innocence or not admitting having committed the crime.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Richard J. Sulla · J. K. v. Peters
  2. “'We conclude that in Wisconsin a trial court can accept an Alford plea of guilty without violating the factual basis rule of Ernst v. State where, despite the defendant's protestations of innocence, the trial court determines that the prosecutor's summary of the evidence the state would offer at trial is strong proof of guilt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Kevin L. Nash · 202 Wis. 2d 21 - State v. Smith
  3. “A discretionary determination, to be sustained, must demonstrably be made and based upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 224 Wis. 2d 621 - State v. Bollig · 228 Wis. 2d 408 - State v. Franklin

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.