192 W. Va. 325 - Wheeler v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 203 W. Va. 561 - State v. Salmons (1998), 206 W. Va. 333 - Shaffer v. Acme Limestone Co., Inc. (1999)
2 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. · 163 W. Va. 332 - Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co. · 186 W. Va. 656 - Garnes v. Fleming Landfill, Inc. · 187 W. Va. 457 - TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. · 183 W. Va. 77 - Anderson v. Moulder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he decision to grant a motion to strike a juror for cause is within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The financial status of [the defendant] is proper for the jury to consider when deliberating the punitive damage issue. When [die defendant] chose to offer the evidence of his low income and minimal assets, plaintiffs counsel was entitled to elicit evidence on rebuttal to counteract the impression that [the defendant] would be unable to satisfy a large punitive damage award. The plaintiff should have been permitted to introduce the evidence of [the defendant’s] liability insurance in order fully to explain the defendant’s financial status to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. Whitlock““‘The true test to be applied with regard to qualifications of a juror is whether a juror can, without bias or prejudice, return a verdict based on the evidence and the court’s instructions and disregard any prior opinions he may have had.’ State v. Charlot, 157 W.Va. 994, 1000 , 206 S.E.2d 908, 912 (1974).” Syl. pt. 1, State v. Harshbarger, 170 W.Va. 401 , 294 S.E.2d 254 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.