Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 W. Va. 620 - Wheeling Clinic v. Van Pelt

192 W. Va. 620 - Wheeling Clinic v. Van Pelt’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 192 W. Va. 189 - Painter v. Peavy · 111 Wis. 2d 518 - Wassenaar v. Panos · Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc. · 161 W. Va. 695 - Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc. · Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3. “Parties may properly contract for liquidated damages (1) where such damages are uncertain and not readily capable of ascertainment in amount by any known or safe rule, whether such uncertainty lies in the nature of the subject, or in the particular circumstances of the ease; or (2) where from the nature of the case and tenor of the agreement, it is apparent that the damages have already been the subject of actual fair estimate and adjustment between the parties.” 4. “A clause for damages in a contract is a penalty rather than a liquidated damage provision when the amount is grossly disproportional in comparison to the damages actually incurred. This is true even though the provision is denominated as liquidated damages in the contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus, in determining whether a clause in a contract stating a sum to be paid in the event of a breach of the contract is liquidated damages or a penalty, the important question is not the intention of the parties but rather the reasonableness in fact of the agreed sum when the contract was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] clause for damages in a contract is a penalty rather than a liquidated damage provision when the amount is grossly disproportional in comparison to the damages actually incurred. This is true even though the provision is denominated as liquidated damages in the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.