Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 192 W. Va. 695 - Mills v. Van Kirk

192 W. Va. 695 - Mills v. Van Kirk’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States v. Owens · 192 W. Va. 189 - Painter v. Peavy · 159 W. Va. 108 - Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner · 187 W. Va. 706 - Andrick v. Town of Buckhannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine the true intent of the legislature, courts are to examine the statute in its entirety and not select `any single part, provision, section, sentence, phrase or word.' Syllabus Point 3, in part, Pristavec v. Westfield Ins. Co., 184 W.Va. 331 , 400 S.E.2d 575 (1990).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The division of highways, subject to the conditions herein, may sell, exchange, or lease real property, or any interest or right therein, held by the division of highways. When the real property, or any interest or right therein, is being held for future road purposes, it may be leased. When the real property, or any part thereof, or any interest or right therein, is deemed by the commissioner not necessary, or desirable for present or presently foreseeable future highways purposes, it may be exchanged for other real property, or any interest or right therein, deemed by the commissioner to be necessaiy or desirable for present or presently foreseeable future highways purposes, or it may be sold. In addition the division may exchange real property, or any part thereof, or any interest or right therein, even though it may be necessary or desirable for present or presently foreseeable future highways purposes, if the exchange is made for other real property, or any interest or right therein, in close proximity thereto which the commissioner deems of equal or superior useful value for present or presently foreseeable future highways purposes. In making exchanges the division may make allowances for differences in the value of the properties being exchanged and may move or pay the cost of moving buildings, structures, or appurtenances in connection with the exchange. Every such sale of real property, or any interest or right therein or structure thereon, shall he at public auction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “AN ACT to amend and reenact section nineteen, article two-a, chapter seventeen of the code of West Virginia, one thousand nine hundred thirty-one, as amended, relating generally to the authority of the commissioner of highways with respect to the sale, lease, exchange or lease of certain real property acquired by the West Virginia department of highways; sale, lease or use of former railroad rights-of-way and those properties which were formerly used as turnpikes and in which the department of highways has a property interest; and permitting those properties to be first sold to abutting property owners without the necessity of public auction. Acts of the Legislature, of West Virginia (1988), chapter 110.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.