¶1—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of his right to be present at an unrecorded Sandoval hearing. The record does not disclose who was present at that hearing. Thus, we remit for a reconstruction of the hearing to determine, inter alia, whether defendant was present (see, People v Mitchell, 192 AD2d 1137). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
193 A.D.2d 1062
People v. Wiley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 28, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1993-05-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2000
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1993-05-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →