Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Ariz. 547 - State v. Marshall

State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · State v. Bible · State v. Atwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the DNA issues were identical to those pending in another unrelated prosecution, the parties agreed to consolidate the pretrial admissibility hearing with that of another defendant.”). We are unaware of any cases that have approved such a consolidation over the objection of one of the parties. 9 . Indeed, Judge Baca was careful to avoid ruling on any case-specific claim. For example, when a defendant representing himself in a capital murder case complained that he had already been”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a technique that meets Frye standards in Arizona.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.