Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 Colo. 3 - Les v. Meredith

Les v. Meredith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2012

10 state decisions

4019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eugene W. Tyler v. Trammell E. Vickery, Ralph Banks, Jr. v. Trammell E. Vickery, James E. C. Perry v. Edward S. Sell, Jr. · Sigma Chi Fraternity v. Regents of University of Colorado · Boyd v. People · Porter v. Shibe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are firm in the belief that the administration of justice is improved if, upon having reason to do so and after holding a hearing, a trial judge can enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity on behalf of the defendant, irrespective of the defendant's wishes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the direction of the verdict ...; any right of the defendant to show that he was in fact sane; and the issues of due process and equal protection as applied to both the commitment and the confinement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Defendant had an absolute right to be tried on the plea of not guilty ..., and he did nothing to waive this right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.