Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 CONN 304 - Bizzoco v. Chinitz

Bizzoco v. Chinitz’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

164
cited by 164 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

6 district · 147 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Gurliacci v. Mayer (1991), Gaudio v. Gaudio (1990)

6 district · 147 state decisions

102019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Appliances, Inc. v. Yost · Piantedosi v. Floridia · Zapolsky v. Sacks · Storm Associates, Inc. v. Baumgold · Molitor v. Molitor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 164 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Courts have a general knowledge of what would be a reasonable attorney's fee for services which are fairly stated and described." Appliances, Inc. v. Yost, 186 Conn. 673 , 680 , 443 A.2d 486 (1982). "[C]ourts may rely on their general knowledge of what has occurred at the proceedings before them to supply evidence in support of an award of attorney's fees. . . . The court [is] in a position to evaluate the complexity of the issues presented and the skill with which counsel had dealt with these issues." Bizzoco v. Chinitz, 193 Conn. 304 , 310-11 , 476 A.2d 572 (1984)."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Accommodation status, itself a form of guaranty, makes an accommodation party”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under that statute, a party seeking to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent must prove "either: (1) that the conveyance was made without substantial consideration and render the transferor unable to meet his obligations; or (2) that the conveyance was made with a fraudulent intent in which the grantee participated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.