Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

193 F. 1023

Docket No. 1,072.

United Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Wright

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1912.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1912-03-12

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2016

1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on United Cigarette Mach. Co. v. Wright

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1912-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

¶2See, also, 156 Fed. 244.

¶3Fred Harper, for appellant.

¶4A. R. Long and Wm. P. Bynum (Harrison & Long, on the briefs), for appellee.

¶5Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and ROSE, District Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7A careful consideration of the assignments of error filed herein impels us to the conclusion that the same are without merit. Therefore the decree of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

/193/f1d/1023 · .json · Public domain