Debus v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis
193 F. 427 · 1910
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1932
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · Frank Thompson v. Henry Fairbanks · Grant v. National Bank · Humphrey v. Tatman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person shall be deemed to have given a preference if, being insolvent, he has, within four months before the filing of the petition, or after the filing of the petition and before the adjudication, * * * made a transfer of any of his property, and the effect of the * * * transfer will be to enable any one of his creditors to obtain a greater percentage of his debt than any other of such creditors of the same class. Whore the preference consists in a transfer, such period of four months shall not expire until four months after the date of the recording or the registering of the transfer, if by law such recording or registering is required.” Comp. St. § 9644.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.