Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

193 F.2d 178

Docket No. 85, Docket 22147.

Bank Line Ltd. v. The Steamship Rio Atuel

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 16, 1951.

Decided Nov. 29, 1951.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1951-11-29

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bank Line Ltd. v. The Rio Atuel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1951-11-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1996

3 federal appellate ·

7019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Kirlin, 'Campbell & Keating, New York City, Robert S. Erskine, New York City, and Malcolm D. Sylvester, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

¶2Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, MacDonald Deming and Charles S. Haight, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.

¶3Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

/193/f2d/178 · .json · Public domain