Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 193 F.2d 384 - Beal v. Holcombe

Beal v. Holcombe’s Empirical Analysis

193 F.2d 384 · 1951

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 1976
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1976 · most notably Avery v. Wichita Falls Independent School District (1957), Williams v. Kansas City, Mo. (1952)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. United States · Sweatt v. Painter · Ex parte Bransford · State of Missouri Gaines v. Canada · Ex parte Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The admissibility of laws separating the races in the enjoyment of privileges afforded by the State rests wholly upon the equality of the privileges which the laws give to the separated groups within the State.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.