Adamowski v. Bard’s Empirical Analysis
193 F.2d 578 · 1952
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2005
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1916 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · United States v. Katz · United States v. National City Lines, Inc. · Miller v. United States · Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In all courts of the United States, seamen may institute and prosecute suits and appeals in their own names and for their own benefit for wages or salvage or the enforcement of laws enacted for their health or safety without prepaying fees or costs or furnishing security therefor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.